vulpes and lupus (was Evening/Night *wekwer-o-)

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex" <alxmoeller@...> wrote:

> Miguel Carrasquer wrote:
> > On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 23:22:58 +0100, alex
> > <alxmoeller@...> wrote:
> >
> >> There is actually the IE *lukos"
> >
> > Actually *wl.'kWos, in a number of languages simplified to
> > *lúkWos.
>
> true for IE. *lukWos paralel with *wl.kWos and from *wl.kWos
>
> >
> >> which could make a plural *luki
> >
> > *lúkWoi.
> >
> >
> > =======================
> > Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> > mcv@...
>
> true for IE, not true for some daugether languages. Are there some
> thoughts of you that the ancient "ki" versus "pi" from the example

given

> (Ulpiana/Ulciana) is absolutely independent and has nothing to do

with

> the alternance of "ki" with "pi" which is today stil alive? If

yes, I

> assume there are very strong reasons and the explanation will

follow.

>
> Alex

You've started discussion about wolves. Ok.

Could anybody explain lith. la~pe:, Latin vulpes and Lith. vilkas,
Lat. lupus...
It makes view that Latin counterchanged these twoo words...