From: whetex_lewx
Message: 36114
Date: 2005-02-03
> >for "night",
> >
> >
> > This brings up an interesting question. The word
> > *nokWts, seems to be one of these t-participles. Perhapsthe
> > original meaning was "darkener", from a supposed rootvocalism.
> > *nekW "darken". However, this does not explain the o-
> >be
> >
> > No evidence for *nekW-, 'darken'. Of course, it could simply
> > an adjective. If I had to guess, it would be related to *nek^-to
> > , 'killing' Cf. *nek^u-, 'corpse'. Depalatalization of *k^w
> > *kW???(p.
>
> From Sihler's New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin, 1995
> 113):known
>
> "For most of the history of IE studies, PIE *nokWt- 'night' was
> only in the o-grade (as in Greek nux, Latin noct-, Old HighGerman
> naht) and possibly as a zero grade in Vedic aktá: 'Night' (theuz
> goddess) if from *n.kWt-éH2-. However, Hittite ne-ku-(uz-)
> zi /nekWtsi/ 'becomes evening', a root-inflected verb, and ne-ku-
> (me-h.ur) /nekWts/ 'at eventide', reveal actual e-grades forthis
> root, and of great antiquity. Tocharian B nekci:ye 'in theevening'
> reflects o-grade, but its meaning at least supports the theorythat
> real meaning of PIE *ne/okW-t- to have been 'evening',not 'night',
> with the further implication that the root *nekW- originallymeant
> something like 'get dark'."darkness. Clouds make the night "get dark"er. Also, if *ne/okWt- was
>
> Between 'evening' and 'night' we have only different degrees of
>were regarded as souls of the dead, became visible. Daytime ghosts
> For our ancestors, darkness was the time when the stars, which
>an
> > Well, I grant your point on sophistication but I wish we had
> > Academie to prohibit ignorant people from writing ''it's"for 'of
> > it'.Lith. va~karas (evening), Lv. vakars, Slav. vec^er, wiec^or
>
> Touché.
>
> - Rob
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links