Re: [tied] Re: Various loose thoughts

On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 01:14:34 +0100, Mate Kapovic
<mkapovic@...> wrote:

>--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:
>
>
>> If I understand Olander's proposal, the expected forms would
>> be:
>>
>> D *-amùs -ómus *-imùs *-umùs
>> (Saussure's law, except in the a:-stems)
>> L *-ie~su(?) *-ósu *-ìsu *-ùsu
>> (no Saussure's law)
>> I *-ómis -imìs -umìs
>> (Saussure's law as above).
>>
>> Is that correct?
>
>You haven't quite got it I think. The accent is supposed to be on the
>thematic vowel (like *-'amus, *-ómus, *-'umus etc.)

I was departing from PB Dpl. *-mo:ns (acute), which should
have triggered Saussure's law (except in the ah2-stems).
Maybe Thomas isn't?

>except when it is
>shifted to the next syllable by de Saussure's Law (thus *-umi`s, *-imi`s) or
>analogically shifted (like *-omi`s by analogy to *-umi`s etc.).

Yes. By "expected forms" I meant to filter out the forms
due to analogy.

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...