From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 35876
Date: 2005-01-11
> Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:exceptions) in
> >
> > That's true. Latin doesn't show <-idus-> next to neuters in <-us,
> > -eris>, but it has them regularly (with only sporadic
> > *-es- stems that developed into <-or, -o:ris> abstractmasculines.
>shouldn't
> which eventually developed back in neutra in Romance (upss... I
> use "neutra" within Romance, would I ?:-))Indeed, it would be far better to say "neuter" :)