Re: [tied] Walachians are placed far North the Danube in Nestor (10

willemvermeer wrote:

>
> I'm also surprised by the arguments from Dacian that keep intruding
> to support the case for transdanubian continuity. If we assume (with
> Georgiev and Duridanov) that Dacian and Thracian were different
> languages (as seems plausible), their maps clearly demonstrate a
> quite massive presence of Dacian in southern Serbia. Hence Dacian
> elements would seem to be irrelevant, to the problem of transdanubian
> continuity.

> Willem

in southern Serbia? In fact so far I know, the Dacian "intrusion" in south
of Danube is beside the Timoc region, merly on the actualy "border" between
Bulgaria and Serbia, isn-t it? Coraborated with the information that between
Serbian & Bulgarian has been "something" which made these languages to
become different languages from Common Slavic, that appears again
interesting..

Alex