--------------------------------------------------------
And that's all we really need in the reply.
May I suggest that in future you eliminate the ballast
from your posting? Ockham's razor in action dear chap
--------------------------------------------------------
"all we really need"????????
I saw that you have used a plural form here to express your
concerns?
So you are here the speaker of the "whole community", and you
think that you are in a good position to speak about the "general
needs of the whole community" ?
Is not a little bit more than acceptable, to can talk with 'we'
here, an to express 'the real needs' for 'all' members?
Like in any social system seems that on this forum there are some
people that easy like to play a "police-man role" (outside of any
argumentation on the discussed topics)...without to take a look
on 'their own garden' first...
So please don't qualify my postings or part of them 'as ballast'.
I didn't make any references to your posted messages (be sure that
I can easy make some comments on how many ideas are inside...) or to
the messages of somebody else...this is the miminum respect that we
can have for each member inside this forum...
But if you want, we can compare my postings with yours in order to
detect on which part the "ballast" is placed...and on which part the
information or new arguments (even true or wrong) are placed also...
Based on your posted messages (and even without them) I don't think
that you have the right to make such qualifications ...
The minimum respect is to allow everybody to express his ideas as
he can and as he want to do...even sometimes you don't like some
messages or part of them (be sure that I and everybody else are in
the same situation) you can easy skip that parts...
So please allow everybody to construct his argumentation as he can
and as he wants in order to sustain his ideas...the lack of arguments
is the main issue in a posting...this for sure can be incriminated by
showing where the errors are placed and to request the needed
arguments or to request not to continue that topic without new
arguments.
But please do not incriminate the form of argumentation of the
other members or the numbers of words inside a message...is not
correct to do this.
As regarding the "police-man" role for the 'whole community':
please refrain to play it...with other members in this forum.
Only the Best,
Marius Alexandru
--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:
>
> --- alexandru_mg3 <alexandru_mg3@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > 5. karacsony < Rom. 'Craciun' 'Christmas'
> > This would be interesting if we had any confidence
> > in the origin of
> > this word. Last year's discusssion of it did not
> > come to any
> > confident conclusion.
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Doesn't matter here the origin of "Crãciun"
> > "Christmas", the
> > epenthetic vowel in Hungarian word is obvious.
>
> *****GK: And that's all we really need in the reply.
> May I suggest that in future you eliminate the ballast
> from your posting? Ockham's razor in action dear chap
> (:=))*****
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail