From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 35147
Date: 2004-11-19
--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "m_iacomi" <m_iacomi@...> wrote:
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:
>
> >> Whose "reconstruction" is this? *-rw- would have given Romanian
> >> <-rb-, as in corb < corvu- /korwu-/. Please stop multiplying
> >> absurdities.
>
> Of course, in CL voicing. Afterwards, /w/ shifts either to /v/
> (most cases) or to /b/.
>
> > Ockham's Razor applies here.
>
> By far.
>
> >> b) Secondly 'corb' is not considered by some linguists (like
> >> Academia Romana) as an inherited Latin word in Romanian.
> >> See DEX (http://dexonline.ro/search.php?cuv=corb&source=)
> >
> > You do well to respect DEX;
>
> Actually he doesn't even respect DEX: the only two entries having
> some reference to the etyma read:
> "Din lat. corvus." (`from Latin corvus`) - DEX '98 and
> "<lat. corvus" - NODEX.
>
> > it's a pity you don't accept the etymology of <horĂ£> given there.
>
> BTW, the ritual circular dance is present as well in Catalonia,
> it's called "sardana", I wonder why Miguel didn't mention it. :-)
>
> >> made by Academia Romana that clearly indicates:
> >>
> >> "din Lat. corvus" and not "Lat. corvus"
> >>
> >> This 'din Lat.' is the DEX indication that is not a Latin
> >> inherited word BUT was loaned via other sources or is a later
> >> Latin loan [...]
> >
> > This is getting ridiculous. Since when does "from Latin"
> > (<din Lat.>) means that the word cannot be in from Latin
> > (whether borrowed or inherited, as in this case)? Where does
> > the dictionary mention such a convention?
>
> It doesn't. There is no such convention. The same applies for
> example for "preot" (Din lat. presbiterum), "munte" (Din lat.
> mons, -tem) or "coase" (Din lat. pop. cosere (= consuere).),
> all of them inherited. There are in DEX '98 some words for which
> one writes that `from` in all letters even if those words are
> undoubtedly inherited.
> Of course, "corb" _is_ inherited (most late Latin loans in
> Romanian -- which are actually very rare -- are connected
> rather with some technical or abstract notions; the name is
> well attested even prior to first preserved Romanian texts).
> I would be _very_ surprised to find a Romanian linguist who
> is really considering "corb" as late Latin loan (to put it in
> a mild tone).
>
> Regards,
> Marius iacomi