From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 34996
Date: 2004-11-07
>Yes.
>Miguel Carrasquer wrote:
>>> because of the explanation of the
>>> macro-hydronimy in Dacia which presents the same change of recorded
>>> "a" to "u" ( see Maris > Muresh, Alutas > Olt, Samos > Somesh,
>>> Dan(ubius) > Dun(area). The Slavic influence here is excluded since
>>> the Slavs did not changed the "a" in "o" in the hydronimy (see Sava
>>> for instance).
>>
>> Slavic *did* change /o/ to /a/, in the hydronymy and
>> everywhere else. Slavic /a/ comes from */a:/ or */o:/.
>>
>> =======================
>> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
>> mcv@...
>
>it suspect we should read "Slavic *did* change /a/ to /o/, etc...."