--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3"
<alexandru_mg3@...> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
> Could somebody help me with the IE derivation of Latin nux,-cis
> and the IE suffixes that are implied here?
> Especially: do we have a -k^ in the IE suffix of Latin nux?
> Please add also, if possible, some cognates of Latin nux and
their
> derivations from PIE.
>
> Thanks and Best Regards,
> marius
************
To Bjorvand-Lindeman (VAEO, pp.676-677) the protoform of Nor.
<hnot>, OE hnutu, Lat. nux, cis should be reconstrued as *knew-,
zero-grade form *knu- (Grim's Law *k > h). Extended form *kne-H-
could explain Celt. *knu:s, gen. *knuwos > OIr cnu, cno; *knu-k
within Lat. nux, gen. nucis. So, ital.-celt. protoform should be
*knuH-, where Lat. gen. nucis < *knuk-es could be explained through
switch *Hs > *ks.
Konushevci