From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 34853
Date: 2004-10-26
>>French also shows the same contrast between vulgar forms<Audry> is the most common French reflex; <Autry> also
>>-ry and erudite forms -ric (cf. Frery and Frederic.
>>Romance languages developped femine forms adding -a, -etta
>>or -ina.
> so *aldarikas in french would be: [aldry]?
> what would the frankish be?--->>[aldrech]?Probably West Frankish <Aldrich>.
> i was also wondering about the high german one... would itOld High German <Altrih>, <Altrich>.
> be plain [aldric]?
> and the west saxon equivalent would be [ealdric]?Yes, though so far as I can tell it isn't attested.
> oh...regarding [aldrick] and [aldridge] being derived fromThat appears to be the case, apart from the fact that the
> [aelfric] or [athelric], does this mean that english names
> like aldrick, aldrich, and aldridge are not connected
> whatsoever to the continental germanic [aldric] meaning
> 'old-king'?