From: Joao
Message: 34817
Date: 2004-10-22
----- Original Message -----
From: "alex" <alxmoeller@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [tied] aldric, luis, aldrin = etymology?
>
> Joao wrote:
> > Perhaps -o is the Latin n-theme (-o, -onis), translating the Gothic
> > n-theme (-a, -ins)
> >
> > Joao SL
>
> I just wanted to pay attention that in the genealogy given, until Alaric,
> there is no Gothic name which ends in "-o" less one; After Alaric, it
> appears that all the Germanic tribes which have lived/have had to do with
> Romans (have there been any Romans as ethnos at that time at all anymore?)
> got this "-o" to their name, even the Vandals got such names less the
> descendants of Eutharicus / Amalasuintha ( see them: Athalaricus rex,
> Vitiges, Mathesuentha, Germanus, Germanus)
>
>
> If traced back _before_ Alaric and Theodoric, we have on the same
genealogy
> level with Theodoric a name which ends in "-o" and this is "Thrasamundo",
a
> Vandal. All other which have been before present the "-us" at the end or
the
> name ends in a consonant. (Hulmul, Oduulf, etc.
>
> Interesting appears a reduction of "nd" if one can consider that the names
> of Berimud, Thorismud are the same compositions as in the names of
> Gesimundus, Hunimundus, Tharasmundo
>
> About names which ends in "-a", one find them even between the first kings
> (Hisarna) but later too (Amalaberga).
>
> Question: how usual was in IE-culture to give names to men which ends in
> "-a"? In Rom. that is not usual , but it is common to have such names for
> men which ends in "-ã"(&).
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>