From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 34802
Date: 2004-10-21
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@...>There is no <-k-> suffix here. The deuterotheme is
> wrote:
>> At 11:11:36 PM on Wednesday, October 20, 2004,
>> he_who_must_not_be_named wrote:
>>> 1. regarding the etymology of the germanic masculine
>>> name: *aldric/aldrick; eng. *aldrich. i think the name
>>> means "old-ruler" right?! what is the latinised form of
>>> the germanic "aldric?" i'm guessing it's *aldrico or
>>> *aldricus.
>> <Aldricus> is well-attested, along with some variant
>> Latinizations (e.g., <Aldericus>).
> The -k- suffix seems to point in the direction of a
> Nordwestblock name.