From: Marco Moretti
Message: 34463
Date: 2004-10-05
>layers
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Marco Moretti"
> <marcomoretti69@...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "loreto bagio" <bagoven20@...>
> > wrote:
> > > lost the battle against Zeus and his sibling-gods. Some say tar-
> > > there is related to the Sanskrit -tala. Incidentally so many
> Indic
> > > names with the suffix -tala are depicted as anyone of the
> ofto
> > > heaven or of the underworld.
> > > Examples are Atala, Patala, Mahatala etc.
> > >
> > > Loreto
> >
> > All these are totally worthless folk-etymologies.
>
> So what are the worthy folk etymologies? Let's just say 'partially'
> not totally to give you a little edge.
>
> > Arabic /arba'/ has a final 'ayin that is sufficient to deny any
> > connection with /rabb/. The verb /arifa/ has another labial
> > consonant, /f/ (from proto-Semitic /p/) and cannot be matched
> > with /arba'/ and with /rabb/.
> > Simply mediaeval absurdities! I understand it without necessity
> > talk with Arabs. You seem to be lost in reverie. We have gotALL FOLK ETYMOLOGIES ARE FALSE. Is for this reason that we call them
> > scientific method, don't forget it.
> >
>
> Now we have proclaimed scientists here?
> Well maybe you are right. But those are the folk etymologies of the
> Arabs and if I am to be scientific I'll start with them. NOt with
> the folk etymologies or should I say 'scientific methods' of
> Europeanists.
> And why is it not necessary to talk to the Arabs?
>
> Loreto