Re: [tied] numbers {was: Venus}

From: loreto bagio
Message: 34456
Date: 2004-10-05

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@...>
wrote:
> I agree with Richard: this is nothing but word-games,
> seizing on every superficial resemblance that comes to hand.
> Cybalist is not the place to ask about every random
> coincidence that comes to hand. If you are proposing a
> relationship between these words, the onus is on you to
> offer real linguistic evidence for it, not to demand
> counter-evidence.
>
> Brian (moderator)

Well did I demand?
I was asked so I answered. If you do'nt like answering then don't
qualify my connections as 'outright' superficial. Give the evidence.
Or moderate me If I become too horrible for horrible's sake.

And well are'nt some of you (or most of you) linguists like
answering questions? You feel like that are'nt you (them also and
maybe 'me'). Why the feeling of aloofness now?
These are your chances. Admittingly I am ignorant of so many things.

And I have heard this line so many times.
>If you are proposing a
> relationship between these words, the onus is on you to
> offer real linguistic evidence for it, not to demand
> counter-evidence.

It is in this list's archive. Quite classical.
But anyway this is your territory so I am thinking of your
suggestion. I have very few evidences. But not as few as some that
has been suggested. So I think I am a little protruded.
Again all apologies.

Loreto