From: elmeras2000
Message: 33678
Date: 2004-08-01
> > > I also fail to grasp the terminology underlying the curiousit
> statement
> > > that an antipassive interpretation of the perfect would make
> anwilling
> > > imperfect (sic?).
> >
> > Based on Kabardian's example.
>
> I cannot follow this. Is there anyone reading this which is
> to explain it to me?Sorry, I meant "who is willing ...". I have come across all sorts of