[tied] Re: Old Czech hpán vs. Modern Czech pan, pán

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:

> On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 16:20:18 +0000, tgpedersen
> <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> >Burrows: The Sanskrit Language p. 169
> >"
> >p-ati 'master'
> >
> >Footnote
> >From pa:- 'to protect, govern'. That the /t/ in this word is

suffixal

> >is evident from its absence inGk. <despoina>. Therefore <páti-> is

to

> >pá- (<nr.pa-, etc) as <vr.káti-> to <vr.ka->.
> >"
>
> Burrows is wrong. There is no way *pot- can be derived from
> *poh3-.
>
>

Not even zero grade *pH3ti- ?

Torsten