Re: [tied] Re: Bader's article on *-os(y)o

From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 32858
Date: 2004-05-22

On Sat, 22 May 2004 00:20:24 +0000, Richard Wordingham
<richard.wordingham@...> wrote:

>Typologically, though, does a system that is reconstructed with *a
>*a: *i and *u require *i: and *u:?

Not necessarily, I suppose.

It does, however, in the case of pre-PIE, where I believe
vowel lengthening was a grammatical device in the formation
of e.g. the perfect (*wáyd- (> *wéid-/*wid-) -> *wá:yd- (>
*woid-)), thematic nouns and verbs (*bha:r-á-ti ( >
*bhére-ti)), and "collective"-like formations (*dhigh-á:m-
(> *dhghóm-/ *dhghém-)).

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...