Re: [tied] Bader's article on *-os(y)o

From: Rob
Message: 32811
Date: 2004-05-20

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "elmeras2000" <jer@...> wrote:

> Only if you are talking thematic. In athematic paradigms there is *-
> mé:n vs. *´-mo:n just as there is *-té:r vs. *´-to:r.

I'd like to give what I think is a possible explanation:

*-mé:n < *-méns < *-máns
*´-mo:n < *´-mons < *´-m@... (< *´-mans ?)
*-té:r < *-térs < *-társ
*´-to:r < *´-tors < *´-t@... (< *´-tars ?)

What do you think?

- Rob