Re: [tied] Re: Bader's article on *-os(y)o

From: enlil@...
Message: 32714
Date: 2004-05-18

I said to Richard:
> No, it does show at the very least allophony because the majority
> pattern is that thematic *-e- becomes *o before a _voiced segment_.
> We never see a thematic vowel *o before *dH or *g but always before
> a voiced phoneme. However, *s is the only consonant that breaks the
> rule.

Egad! I meant "We never see a thematic vowel _*e_ before *dH and *g..."
Phew.


= gLeN