Re: [tied] *g'(h)- > d as aberrant outcome

elmeras2000 wrote:

> Well, *are* there any examples deciding whether non-labiovelar *gh
> is palatalized or not in Albanian? I wouldn't like to stake too much
> in gjenj 'find' vs. Lat. prehendo:.
>
> Jens

If I won't see here Alb. "gjen" with the meaning "find" I will ask you
if you want to have examples of non-palatalised PIE *gh- in Romanian.
It seems a bit strange that until now none from the "Kenner" of this
subject did not show any examples. Are the established etymologies in
Albanian so unsure that one cannot show any PIE *gh- with its reflex
in Albanian?

Alex