Re: Heralding

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "m_iacomi" <m_iacomi@...> wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Abdullah Konushevci" wrote:
>
> >>> *** I am repeating this message, with one new entry, because,
> >>> according to M. Iacomi, if you are not heralded by so-called
> >>> authorities, your claim is not true or is dubious. :))***
> >>
> >> You may laugh, but you are asserting false ideas as being mine
> >> and that's not nice at all.
> [...]
> >> So, you should have already understood that you were falsely
> >> thinking at the idea "if you are not heralded by so-called
> >> authorities, your claim is not true or is dubious" as being
> >> mine. It is sad to see it re-emerging with the same false
> >> label, even under the protection of a smiley. Feed back.
>
> > Because I don't like to argue with you, I will cite a Latin
> > sentence, valid even in law: Qui tacet consentire videtur.
>
> It's not valid on discussion lists where people do not have any
> obligation to answer to some marginal topic inserted in a message
> of some contributor. Of course, you might keep your convictions if
> you prefer illusions to proper understanding.
> Anyway, my intervention was _not_ aimed to re-open the debate
> about the topic, it was intended to clarify a misunderstanding
> of yours which made you state a false allegation about me, as
> one could realize by simple reading of the "Subject" line. After
> puting it in clear, you are still in deep misunderstanding since
> you are starting a different useless discussion:
>
> > But, it's not valid concerning the words, present also in
> > Albanian, <çikë> 'a little bit', [...] even Mr. Vidal claims
> > that it can't be true, you insist on your attitude that you
> > have right.
>
> The right question at this point is: are you really reading
> what I am writing? If not, just say so: it is senseless to lose
> my time any longer. If yes, it's still bad since you have shifted
> the issue deliberately. For what's worth: I do _NOT_ think that
> "if you are not heralded by so-called authorities, your claim is
> not true or is dubious" as you falsely asserted. That was the only
> thing I wanted to hint out, the debate is closed: you should have
> simply said: OK, I understood, now it's late.
>
> Have a nice day,
> Marius Iacomi

************
Dear Marius,
I appreciate too much your precious time, for I have reading
carefully your messages in Cybalist and, despite my deep disagreement
with your attitude to romanize or, at least, to slavicize the PIE
studies, I always try to be polite with you as much as one could be.
But, be sure, that I will do everything to no more reply in your
messages, if I would not be appealed to feedback. Really, it's too
late now to change anything.

Konushevci