Re: [tied] Demonstratives

In article <000d01c41b3c$11e62660$b2babac2@...> ????? ??i?dy??? <ponaryad@...> wrote:
. . .

>
> I don't think that *o:i here was a single phoneme. It would be better to interprete it as *o: + *i/*y (or even *o + *o + *i/*y). So the example is not valide.
>

Wouldn't this just be thematic *o + *oi (the o-grade of the normal
dative singular ending)?

--
Brent J. Ermlick Veritas liberabit uos
brent3@...