From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 31673
Date: 2004-04-02
>>>>*yo certainly did become aIt is possible that *yo- is derived from *i-, but the two
>>>>demonstrative. It is regularly used that way in Latin.
>>>In Latin? Where? I know this language not badly, and cannot find there
>anything similar!
>>Me neither. Perhaps the intention was is, id, ea etc. (which
>>are from the anaphoric pronoun *i-, obl. *e-, not from the
>>realtive/interrogative *yo-).
>
>Ah! Sorry! I certainly did mean is ea id, and assumed without checking
>that it was from *yo. Though I note that Pokorny treats them as one stem,
>with two uses, and gets support for this from both Brugmann and Pedersen.
>So at least in this error I am in good company.