Re: [tied] Whence Grimm?

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:

> --- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > GK: Note that the Przeworsk culture was
> > > constituted in the 3rd c. BC and evolved from the
> > > fusion of various elements: Jastorf + "local"
> > > (varieties of Late Lusatian) + La Tene. The
> > prevailing
> > > view today is that Przeworsk was fundamentally an
> > East
> > > Germanic (eventually Vandalic) complex, in which
> > the
> > > Celtic and "local" components dissolved. So both
> > of
> > > your possibilities ( (1) and (2) above) seem to
> > > involve Germanic influencing Germanic.
> > >
> >
> >(T) First, let me say that I appreciate that you have
> > chosen to use
> > arguments this time like a grownup, Western European
> > style instead of
> > demanding I be silenced.
>
> *****GK: One never demands that a grownup using
> Western European style arguments be silenced. But
> endless repetition of refuted points (which was
> Torsten style, not Western European style
> argumentation) comes to be as annoying as the prattle
> of a 3 yr old. Everyone on this list (with only one
> exception as best as I can make out, one TP (:=)))
> seems to understand that. As long as you follow the
> "grown up way" you will have no problem with me or
> anyone else I think. Just a preliminary reminder
> before acceeding to your queries.******
>

The only repetition involved was your constant invoking of the
beating of the dead horse simile in lieu of counter-argument, of
which you had run out. And I can't see anything wrong in looking for
alternative routes from the Sea of Azov to (the province in Germany I
can't mention), whenever one of them had been blocked by evidence;
that in itself should show that I did not endlessly "repeat refuted
points" as you claim.


Torsten