From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 31547
Date: 2004-03-25
>25-03-2004 14:46, tgpedersen wrote:And no, if it meant "ten-thing" (thematic n. sg.).
>
>> BTW is there a connection between gen.pl. *-om and the collective
>> suffix of *(d)km-t-om ?
>
>Yes, if it meant '(ten) of tens'.
>