>From: "S.Kalyanaraman" <kalyan97@...>
>
[clip]
>This cannot be explained away as
>coincidence which is the normal practice to avoid studying the I in
>the I-E. Have there been studies other than Kuiper's Nahali to dig
>deeper into the substratum I in the I-E?
>
Ya know, I normally don't reply like this, but ... before you are quick to
dismiss co-incidence, please study statistics. It isn't as rare as you seem
to think it is.
It is not "normal practice to void studying the I in the I-E". That would be
even stupider than the inference that is it normal practice.
Sorry, back to lurking ...
_________________________________________________________________
Say �good-bye� to spam, viruses and pop-ups with MSN Premium -- free trial
offer!
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200359ave/direct/01/