The palatal sham :) (Re: [tied] Re: Albanian (1))

--- Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:

> Only thing that worries me is why the Skt. causative is janáyati
> and not *ja:náyati. Shouldn't the laryngeal have been deleted in
> *gOnh1-éy-e/o-?

Analogical levelling sometimes messes thing up even in Sanskrit.

P.S. Among you, in the name "Vedic", how many of you say "Veedic",
and how many pronounce the "e" Sanskrit fashion as in "vague"?