Re: [tied] Re: Romanian verbal paradigm

Miguel Carrasquer wrote:

>
> Albanian <q> and <gj> are palatal stops. They are neither /k/, /g/
> nor /t/, /d/, but something right in between. Like Hungarian <ty>
> and <gy>.
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...

And that will expalin very well why latin "ki" has been rendered as
"q" in Albanian. A such observation if true will tell us the "q" in
Albanian has its value before the Roman times I will suggest.

How I said, I observed the "t" versus "k" difference in Albanian, but
I did not observed the "gj" versus "d". You got me curious, I will
take a look.

Alex