Re: The palatal sham :) (Re: [tied] Re: Albanian (1))

From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 30920
Date: 2004-02-10

On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 22:02:36 -0800 (PST), enlil@... wrote:

>However, as I told Miguel *septm would have to be from
>Common Semitic since East Semitic doesn't work to explain
>the mimation chronologically or geographically.

East Semitic is the *only* solution that works to explain the mimation.
There is no other Semitic language that mimates the numerals. Not even
Sabaic, which mimates singular nouns in the absolute state, does that.

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...