The palatal sham :) (Re: [tied] Re: Albanian (1))

From: elmeras2000
Message: 30885
Date: 2004-02-09

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...>
wrote:

> Are we bound to not inserting intermediate stages, but have to
bundle
> the whole thing within one reconstructed language?

Ideally, yes. If the IE languages are related, there must have been
a language from which they are all descended, and it is our main
objective to uncover that. And all true archaisms must have a place
in that reconstruction.

Jens

Previous in thread: 30884
Next in thread: 30897
Previous message: 30884
Next message: 30886

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts