From: P&G
Message: 30802
Date: 2004-02-07
>the perfect of *mad- or *kap-Given that there is no evidence (on your own admission) that assumption is
> nobody could provide more info. So I assumed that it was
> an open possibility that *a could alternate with *o.
>I can'tThat was my point originally - /a/ is different from the ablauting vowel,
> imagine why a language would just alternate *e and not *a too.
> Since based on all other world languages a language MUST have aYes, and we knowits distribution, and that it didn't ablaut.
> low vowel to balance out high ones, we know that IE DID have *a.
> So, why wouldn't *a alternate with *o in ablaut? In English ...Your English examples show that in English /a/ can ablaut, but they don't