From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 30781
Date: 2004-02-06
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Marco Moretti"Marcus
> <marcomoretti69@...> wrote:
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > German <Late>, <Lite> (note odd vowel alternation) "serf(?)",
> known
> > > mainly from Lower Saxony, ie Nordwestblock; Medieval Latin
> > <laetus>,
> > > thus *lait-, *le:t- (claims Kuhn). He further compares with
> > > Langobardian (in Latin) <aldius>, <aldio>.
> >
> > Why Medieval Latin? The term /laetus/ is already attested in
> > Aurelius' times. It's of Etruscan origin: in inscriptions wehave
> > have /lethe/ 'serf'. The Langobardian item is puzzling and I
> nowith
> > good explanation for it, but it can very difficult be related
> > Latin laetus.context?
> >
>
> I've seen it explained as a loan from a Celtic *le:t- with loss
> of /p/ from *ple:t-.
>
> Do you have a quote of the early occurrence of Latin <laetus>, it
> would be interesting to see the geographical and sociological
>immigration
> Other than that, it's possible to fit all the facts into Kuhn's
> world: an Italic *le:t- arrives in Tuscany with an Italic
> wave from Westphalia, and gets overlaid by the Etruscans arrivingin
> Tuscany.************
>
>
> Torsten