From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 30769
Date: 2004-02-06
> Dan:<Snip>
> > However neat your story (or two stories) on pure linguistic
> > grounds, it seems to me to defy common sense that I. E.
> > would borrow the word for "seven" from Semitic, wait a thousand
> > years or so and then borrow the word for "six".
> > Did the words replaced lost I.-E. words or were new concepts?It is quite possible that at some stage pre-PIE no more had these
>
> I severely doubt that IE didn't have words for "six" and "seven"
> before it borrowed them from Semitic. For some reason, many
> people seem to still think that hunter-gatherers are mathematical
> dolts that can't possibly count up to ten. As if "ten" is an
> elitist number that only agricultural peoples may discover,
> a somehow unattainable amount in the mesolithic world. Strange
> how some people think.
> > It's hard to imagine whatever sociological situation ledThis is, however, an argument that they ought to have been borrowed
> > to the borrowing of seven was repeated long after for six.
> Religion and numerological symbology. "Seven" especially is a
> recurrent symbol of the divine in ancient Near-Eastern worldview.
> Not only population and genetics but culture and worldview had
> spread to Europe with the advent of agriculture in the neolithic.
>
> Seven planetary bodies, seven levels of heaven, seven stars of
> the Pleiades, seven doves, seven days a week, Snow White and
> the seven dwarfs, seven-up, seven-eleven, hehehe :) But
> seriously now. Seven is an important number. So was six and was
> especially used in the Bible (also derived from these older
> views) as the opposing "evil" number of Satan. However, I've
> suggested that "six" and "seven" originally represented the
> female and male principle, respectively, and that this is why
> "six" is in the feminine and "seven" is in the masculine form.
> The two numbers added together whether literally or symbolically
> represent wholeness.