From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 30557
Date: 2004-02-03
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:Paul
>
> > 03-02-04 03:02, Abdullah Konushevci wrote:
> >
> >> First of all, I think that were much bigger authorities in
> >> Albanology, like Gustav Meyer, Norbert Jokl, Holger Pedersen,
> >> Kretschmer, Eqrem Çabej, Carlo Tagliavini, Waclaw Cimochowski,support
> >> Radoslav Katicich, Shaban Demiraj, Eric Hamp - all proclaimed
> >> linguists and albanologists in the world, that backed up the
> >> origin of Albanian language from Illyrian,
> > [...]
> > First, it isn't true that all of the above great linguists
> > the Illyrian hypothesis. Jokl and Cimochowski do so with sometroublesome
> > reservations; Hamp refrains from speculating about Illyrian and
> > is more or less agnostic about the whole question, while Weigand
> > connects Albanian with Thracian and Dacian.
>
> Just for fun, let's quote from C. Tagliavini's "Le origini delle
> lingue neolatine":
> "In Southern part of Illyria, in a region roughly corresponding
> to ancient Dardania, an Indo-European people, maybe [!] a mixture
> of Illyrians and Thracians [!], was about to be linguistically
> Romanized. It's Albanian people.
> While the craddle of Albanian language is highly uncertain, all
> researchers agree nowdays to assert it to a region North of today
> Albania and far enough from the sea; the presence of a large number
> of Latin elements and of a reduced number of ancient Greek elements
> makes us think, anyway, to a region North of Jirecek line. [...]".
> Not quite the same, eh?! :-)
> Also E. Hamp, even in a review article available also online, is
> far from being so decisive, describing the issue as "the
> and inconclusive question of Illyrian and Thracian, and theirwhole
> possible relation to Albanian" and ends out with "Clearly, the
> question remains completely open".************
> (http://members.tripod.com/~Groznijat/balkan/ehamp.html)
>
> > Secondly, in science it's sound argumentation that matters, not
> > "bigger authorities".
>
> Agreed; moreover, some of those "auctoritae" were not so keen to
> an unconditional support of exclusive Illyrian descent. I think
> this is still a fairly undecidable issue since information is low.
>
> Regards,
> Marius Iacomi