Re: The palatal sham :) (Re: [tied] Re: Albanian (1))

----- Original Message -----
From: "Miguel Carrasquer" <mcv@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 4:22 AM
Subject: Re: The palatal sham :) (Re: [tied] Re: Albanian (1))


> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:51:35 +0100, Mate Kapovi? <mkapovic@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Piotr Gasiorowski" <piotr.gasiorowski@...>
> >To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 7:49 AM
> >Subject: Re: The palatal sham :) (Re: [tied] Re: Albanian (1))
> >
> >
> >
> >> I have no strong opinion either way (look as hard as I can, I can't see
> >> a laryngeal in *jugom),
> >
> >I am not sure but I think that the negative a- in Sanskrit lengthens
before
> >*(H)yewg-...
>
> That's áyuj-, no lengthening.

Vedic a:-junak(t) ~ Greek zeug- =/= Vedic a-yajat ~ Greek hágios.
Lengthening.

Mate