From: alex
Message: 30213
Date: 2004-01-28
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex" wrote:that does not change anything in the ecuation about some sounds.
>
>>> You gave the implicit answer: nothing. There is no obligation for
>>> Balkan Romance to adopt a low-represented phoneme (if any) from
>>> substratum language. That is: any indication favoring existence
>>> of /x/ in Dacian is of no use for Balkan Romance, direct ancestor
>>> of Romanian, a different language.
>>
>> Man! You are indeed refusing any logic here?
>> A) one language spoken by a populatin. This population , this
>> language has "h"
>
> Might have had.
>
>> B) Latin Language
>> B+A= Balkan Romance
>
> Wrong. Balkan Romance is not B + A but B including some elements
> of A.
>You are welcome. I hate the whoory politness. I say what I think as every
>>>> I could agree with you if you demonstrate it letting by side
>>>> the nonsenseof missing "h" in Latin.
>>>
>>> Replace "nonsense" with "my unability to understand the
>>> importance" and you'll get a correct phrase.
>>
>> If this is an explanation then that explanation simply does
>> nothing else as "sugeo".
>
> Welcome to my killfile.
> Have further fun.
>
> Marius Iacomi
>