[tied] Re: rom. hameS - or Romanian /h/ theories

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex" wrote:

>> You gave the implicit answer: nothing. There is no obligation for
>> Balkan Romance to adopt a low-represented phoneme (if any) from
>> substratum language. That is: any indication favoring existence
>> of /x/ in Dacian is of no use for Balkan Romance, direct ancestor
>> of Romanian, a different language.
>
> Man! You are indeed refusing any logic here?
> A) one language spoken by a populatin. This population , this
> language has "h"

Might have had.

> B) Latin Language
> B+A= Balkan Romance

Wrong. Balkan Romance is not B + A but B including some elements
of A.

>>> I could agree with you if you demonstrate it letting by side
>>> the nonsenseof missing "h" in Latin.
>>
>> Replace "nonsense" with "my unability to understand the
>> importance" and you'll get a correct phrase.
>
> If this is an explanation then that explanation simply does
> nothing else as "sugeo".

Welcome to my killfile.
Have further fun.

Marius Iacomi