[tied] Re: Against the theory of 'Albanian Loans in Romanian'

Hello Piotr,

First, I have no link with any "<bumbrek>/<bubrek>"...I never wrote
such things.

I wrote this message, only because I was suprised to see Piotr
writting things like:
<< Alb. raketë : Rom. rachetã. It proves that rocket
technology was first developed for travel in "Thracian space". >>

If these are your thoughts, and you think that are usefull to put
them on this forum....I really don't know what to say....(seems that
some posting here really affect you...)

Best Regards,
marius alexandru

P.S. But honestly, until now, on the real topic, I don't see your
arguments ...regarding "the albanian loans in romanian"...you only
made this affirmation, and use it for further developments.





--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Piotr Gasiorowski"
<piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Abdullah Konushevci" <a_konushevci@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 3:13 PM
> Subject: [tied] Re: Against the theory of 'Albanian Loans in

Romanian'

>
>
> > One of biggest nonsense I have seen in Internet is treating the

word

> <bumbrek>/<bubrek> 'kidney' as subtratal one, even by any one who
> know just a little Turkish, may be noticed that it is a loan from
> Turkish <böbrek> 'kidney'. Furthermore, it was made by some one who
> knows relationship between Albanian and Romanian.
>
> I've found another one: Alb. raketë : Rom. rachetã. It proves that

rocket

> technology was first developed for travel in "Thracian space". And
> seriously, this kind of blunder is not unknown even among

professional

> linguists if they fail to check their data carefully.
>
> Piotr