Re: [tied] Re: PIE Ploughs

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 02:18:59 +0100 (MET), Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen
<jer@...> wrote:

>Hey, you don't *really* mean "*-dHlom" with a voiced aspirate? Has my poor
>wife Birgit Olsen been preaching in vain that the IE alternation was
>*-tlo-/*-thlo- (after roots without liquids) ~ *-tro-/-thro- (after roots
>containing a liquid), in both cases with the aspirate restricted to the
>position after non-syllabified laryngeals H1 and H2?

Piotr seems to have access to Olsen '88 or perhaps other relevant papers
(the articles on -idus ['92] and laryngeal aspiration ['94] from the
bibliograpgy to the Armenian book look like they might be relevant), but
unfortunately I don't.

Is it possible to have a quick update on the main points (e.g. what about
poculum and pabulum)?

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...