From: tgpedersen
Message: 29792
Date: 2004-01-19
> > > I was simply wrong. The source on which the quote was based waslength.
> > > apparently very rough, and without any indication of vowel
> > > Being /wa:num/ with a long vowel, the only possible ancestorNor is your proposal.
> > > is /*we:num-/, that is in any case pre-IE. Interesting is the
> > > suffix /-um-/.
> > > So I can now only affirm that the nearest possible cognate of
> > Vanir
> > > is Greek /(w)anakt/. The central meaning is not "bright".
> > >
> > As far a I know, the only I.-E. etymology that has beenmentioned.
> > suggested for Gk. (w)anax is the same *wnh1- that Piotr
> > If so, the Vanir have lots of cognates. However, more likelyextremely
> > (w)anax isn't I.E. at all, but a pre-Greek title retained by the
> > Myceneans, in which case a connection to the Vanir seems
> > unlikely.That is an interesting theory. If <Vanir> does not belong to the IE
> > Dan
>
> But I always affirmed that Gr. (w)anaks isn't IE. It IS a pre-Greek
> word. And I never said that Vanir belong to IE world.
>But a remotenot
> connection between pre-IE Germ. /*wan-/ and pre-Greek /*wan-/ is
> so implausible.True. And the remoter, the more plausible?
>We find some substratum roots occurring in huge areasI see. So <Vanir> is now a substrate word in Germanic? Have you, in
> of Europe, from Spain to Baltic. In pre-IE times there were many
> languages, some related each other and some other isolated.
>