From: Daniel J. Milton
Message: 29748
Date: 2004-01-18
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowskiween
> <piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:
> > 15-01-04 18:40, Brian M. Scott wrote:
> >
> > > s.v. <wânam>. (Warning: This is quite a large file.) There
> > > are also entries for <wânami> str. fem. 'Glanz' ('shine')
> > > and an adverb <wânamo> 'glänzend' ('shiningly').
> >
> > But this word comes from *we:numa-, related to Middle English
> > 'beautiful' < *we:njo- and perhaps to the 'hope, imagine' word-can
> family
> > (Goth. we:njan, OE we:nan, OS wânjan, ON væ:na, ...). It
> beconnected
> > related to the name of the Vanir (unless both are somehow
> withrequires a
> > *wenh1-, but that, while supported by some dictionaries,
> lotVanir
> > of semantic prestidigitation).
> >
> > Piotr
>
> I was simply wrong. The source on which the quote was based was
> apparently very rough, and without any indication of vowel length.
> Being /wa:num/ with a long vowel, the only possible ancestor
> is /*we:num-/, that is in any case pre-IE. Interesting is the
> suffix /-um-/.
> So I can now only affirm that the nearest possible cognate of
> is Greek /(w)anakt/. The central meaning is not "bright".***********
>
> Marco.