Richard Wordingham wrote:
>
> Do you know the Aromanian equivalent of _tuns_? Latin _tonsus_
> should yield DR *tos. The other Romance languages are of little
> help here. French _tondre_ 'to shear, to clip' has past participle
> _tondu_, and Italian has the iterative form _tosare_ < *tonsare,
> albeit based on the past participle _tonsus_. Unsurprisingly the
> Latin perfect _totondi:_ has no representation in Romanian; I don't
> think reduplicated perfects survive anywhere in Romance.
>
> Richard.
So far I know the Arom. form is the same as in DR , namels "tuns" .
Arom. name here "tunsulu", Dacorum. "tunsu"
But one do not need to worry about these forms since they are explained
due analogy. It is worth to remember that the verb "tunde" in form knows
the forms with voiced "s" since there people use the "z"( of course by
Mr. Iacomy considered as "bad Romanian")
Eu tunz, tu tunzi, sa tunzã etc. But I guess we discussed once about
these analogical forms with voiced "z" due analogy of the II pers. sg.
where d+(conj. stem for II sg)i > zi. prinde > prinzi, tunde > tunzi,
raspunde > raspunzi.. etc.
Thus, contrary to that what Piotr means , it appears possible to have
nsV > nzV if the V = /i/,/i/,/y/
Alex