Re: [tied] IE g^ , gwe -> dacian g', z

Hello Piotr,
This seems very possible for me...

But the real satem issue is the other one :
PIE arg' -> Argessos/Argissos (Dac. ge/gi ) ->never arrive to z.

Best Regards,
marius alexandru

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Piotr Gasiorowski"
<piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 2:43 PM
> Subject: [tied] IE g^ , gwe -> dacian g', z
>
>
> > 1. PIE gwher -> Germisara (Dac. ge) -> Zermisara (Dac. z)
>
> > (please note that ge->z is a later transformation in Dacian,

because

> Germisara is also attested)
>
> Such variable spellings look to me like attempts to render

foreign /3^/

> (/dZ/) for which there was no letter in the scribes' native

orthography.

>
> Piotr