From: tgpedersen
Message: 29491
Date: 2004-01-13
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowskisigmatic
> <piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:
> > 12-01-04 10:39, Marco Moretti wrote:
> >
> > > Are we sure that /*Ops-ko/ and /*Xeruska-/ < /*Kerusko-/ are
> formed
> > > from IE roots? Etymological explanations are very poor in the
> case of
> > > Osci: the name originally didn't belong to Samnites, but to a
> > > submitted people of Campania, of uncertain origin; a variant
> Opici
> > > was also used. Cherusci may be from an IE root
> for "stag", "deer",
> > > still preserved in the learned English word "hart". But
> > > suffix is quite strange.and
> >
> > I'd say that the suffix is ethnonymic *-(i)sko- in both cases,
> thatthe
> > Cherusci = *xerut-(i)ska-, either with a shorter variant of the
> suffix
> > or with early syncope of *-i-. *op-iko- and *op-sko-, if so
> divided,
> > would then be parallel forms with alternative suffixes playing
> samelanguage
> > function (fpom op- 'power'?)
>
> It is very probable, but we lack conclusive evidence. All these
> ethnonyms are very ancient. In particular, we do know nothing about
> the Opsci, Opici before Samnites conquer and assimilated (or
> partially exterminated) them. Samnites imposed their Italic
> to the won people. It is not so sure that this Op- came from/
> /op-/, "power", that was very used in historic Oscan, in which /ops-
> is the common root for "to do" (even more used than /opus/ inLatin).
>Meid: