>
> >>>>> Udolph is very insistent that the place names (eg.
> >>>>> -horst/-hurst) indicate that the Anglo-Saxon migration
> >>>>> took place from the interior of Germany,
>
> >>>> Why, given the evidence of Frisian?
>
> >>> The place name evidence he offers seems solid enough.
>
> >> That hardly answers the question.
>
> > Udolph in general only takes place name evidence into
> > consideration.
>
> That's what I'm asking about: *what* place-name evidence?
>
Oh, why didn't you say so?
"Chapter K: Beziehungen zwischen dem Zentrum und dem Westen (vor
allem England) 1. horst, 2. kreek, 3. lage, 4. Ufer, 5. wapel"
According to his maps:
horst:
large concentrations in Kent, Sussex, Lake District, Eastern
Netherlands, Westphalia, North of Lower Elbe (Holstein, Mecklenburg),
West of Lower Oder, some along Middle Rhine.
kreek
Large concentration in East Fladers, a few spread in England, a few
in Westphalia
lage
large concentration between the rivers Ems and Weser
Ufer
concentration along the Middle Rhine, spread all over England a few
in the Low Germana ares west of the Elbe
wapel
a few in England and in the Low German area west of the Elbe, three
in Southern Jutland
This is of course a description with few details. Perhaps you should
acquire the book yourself?
Torsten