From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 29213
Date: 2004-01-07
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...>wrote:
> > Masculine o-stems in West Germanic had either generalized theam
> > nom. form *-o:siz (OE -as, OS -os) or the acc. form *-anz
> > (OHG -a, OLF -a).
> How does one arrive at *-o:siz; it looks like a "double plural"? I
> much reminded of Latin Eud-os-i "Jutes?". Is *-o:siz PGmc?It's PIE nominative plural *-o:ses, also seen in Sanskrit -a:sas and