From: Jim Rader
Message: 29170
Date: 2004-01-06
>
> For a word _not_ linked with `Christmas` and `feast`, yes, the
> Proto-Slavic form you & your source of inspiration gave explains
> the phonetical shape. You still conveniently forget about actual
> meaning which has very little to do with your proto-word. I can
> perfecly explain that by contamination _in Russian_ between a
> Slavic original word having nothing to do with `Christmas` or
> `(winter) feast` and an early (Balkan-)Romance loanword meaning
> `Christmas` for Romance population and `(winter) feast` for those
> Slavs getting it. The distribution of meanings points to that as clear
> as Via Appia, Via Salaria and Via Ostiense point to Rome.
>
> Marius Iacomi
>