From: tgpedersen
Message: 29106
Date: 2004-01-05
>European
> Kuhn (in "Das letzte Indogermanisch") finds a type of river and
> island names in *((s)C)[ur-/ar-/ir-] surrounding Krahe's Old
> river names, also in the western Nordwestblock, in the eastern partScandinavia.
> it's confined to a narrow coast strip and continues into
> He mentions some of them as being endungslos in the nominative:<Dur>
> in Ireland, <Nar> in Italy.the
>
> Now if it were the case that the non-IE substrate language in the
> Nordwestblok had no cases (slim evidence, I admit), then probably
> (non-Celtic, non-Germanic) Nordwestblock languages that replacedthem
> had no cases either (it is very difficult for people that grow upIn other words, the Nordwestblock peoples were caught between a rock
> without cases to see the usefulness of them, cf Scandinavians or
> English trying to speak German). The same situation (no cases, etc)
> would then apply to the Germanic language that replaced the
> Nordwestblockese (most likely several dialects, note that Arminius,
> most likely a Nordwestblock speaker could not maintain his position
> as dictator after the present danger was done with, whereas the
> Swebian (in the cultural sense) Marbod could; the newly introduced
> Germanic, ie Swebian would have much fewer dialects than
> Nordwestblokese).
>also
> Of the people that according to Bede colonised England, the Saxons
> were a "reconstitued" Nordwestblock people. Jutes, if my
> interpretation is correct, was a collective designation for
> Nordwestblock/Jutland people, which leaves the Angli, which were
> well out of the way of the Thuringians to begin with. In otherwords,
> a good part of those people that occupied England probably didn'tEngland is full of -tun place names. They are found on the continent
> speak a proper Germanic, but a creole version.
>