Re: [tied] Re: Baltic RUKI etc.

05-01-04 09:18, Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:

> 05-01-04 08:49, wtsdv wrote:
>
>> Did the RUKI change take place after *l? If so, does that
>> mean that *l was probably alveolar?
>
> Not in Balto-Slavic.

Sorry, it wasn't a very clear answer, was it? What I meant was that the
RUKI change hadn't taken place after *l in Baltic and Slavic.

Piotr