[tied] Re: Baltic RUKI etc.

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:

> This seems to imply that PIE *n was dental, not alveolar,
> and that perhaps *h2/*h3 were post-velar rather than velar
> (by the time of the RUKI-law).

Did the RUKI change take place after *l? If so, does that
mean that *l was probably alveolar?

David